TeamBotics · Toronto · An audit of the hiring front door

Operation Front Door

Every deployment tested live, from the candidate's chair, with the same eight questions.

Muse independent test — Burlington Stores, “Allison” (Phase 4)

Transcript (as captured)

A0, A and B were deflected to the career page / job description. A additionally — and falsely, for a Tyler, TX posting — said “We don’t currently have any Retail Sales Associate positions open in Toronto, ON, CA” (the session’s IP geolocation substituted for the posting’s location; compare Gap in this phase and Sodexo/Johnson Controls in Phase 1). C gave generic Burlington values; D repeated them. E said to browse positions and “I can help you apply!”. At F, Allison claimed: “I’m happy to help. Can I answer any questions about Burlington for you?” G was deflected.

Scores

A0 FAIL · A FAIL · B FAIL · C PARTIAL · D FAIL · E FAIL · F PARTIAL (claim only — see scorer’s note) · G FAIL — 0 PASS / 2 PARTIAL / 6 FAIL

Session findings (observed, not inferred)

Scorer’s note (ledger normalization): the live tester scored this session’s F answer “PASS (claim only)”; under the investigation’s standing convention from Phase 1, a capability claim contradicted by the same session’s A0–D performance is scored PARTIAL. The CSV and tallies use PARTIAL; the tester’s original label is preserved in this note.

Browser capture of Allison stating there are no Retail Sales Associate positions open in Toronto, Ontario, in a session launched from a Tyler, Texas posting
Browser capture from this test session: the Toronto denial, against the Tyler, TX posting open behind the panel. Click the frame to view it full size.

← All transcripts · Findings