TeamBotics · Toronto · An audit of the hiring front door

Operation Front Door

Every deployment tested live, from the candidate's chair, with the same eight questions.

Muse independent test — Whole Foods Market, “Sage” (Phase 4)

Transcript (as captured)

A0, A and B were deflected to the career page / job description, interleaved with name demands. C gave generic Whole Foods growth/customer-service values. D: “I apologize, that’s all the information I have available.” E said to browse opportunities and “I can help you apply!”. At F, Sage claimed: “I can answer any of your questions about our business, culture, team and more.” G was deflected. The posting page itself contains a full job description (Responsibilities, Knowledge/Skills, etc.), which Sage did not deliver at any point.

Scores

A0 FAIL · A FAIL · B FAIL · C PARTIAL · D FAIL · E FAIL · F PARTIAL (claim only — see scorer’s note) · G FAIL — 0 PASS / 2 PARTIAL / 6 FAIL

Session findings (observed, not inferred)

Scorer’s note (ledger normalization): the live tester scored this session’s F answer “PASS (claim only)”; under the investigation’s standing convention from Phase 1, a capability claim contradicted by the same session’s A0–D performance is scored PARTIAL. The CSV and tallies use PARTIAL; the tester’s original label is preserved in this note.

Browser capture of Sage making its question-answering claim between name demands
Browser capture from this test session: the question-answering claim, between name demands. Click the frame to view it full size.

← All transcripts · Findings